Thank you IntroComp!
Infocom Gone Wild!

Next Steps for The Z-Machine Matter

Considering the various reviews and Introcomp feedback on my game The Z-Machine Matter, there's no doubt a lot of work ahead of me.  I feel like I signed up for a 10k race and somehow ended up in a Marathon.  Maybe an Ultra Marathon.  Here's my own assessment of The Z-Machine Matter in its current state:

  • As a prototype or proof of concept, it's not bad for those who like old-school mysteries
  • The PDF manual, plot and characters pay hommage to classic Infocom mystery games
  • There's a hint of a multi-layered plot around a murder mystery with cold war intrigue
  • There's some decent use of Inform Extensions, built-in hints and standard commands to suggest the game may one day have reasonably good fit & finish 

But...

  • Not everyone is impressed by having an homage to Infocom
  • The game needs to be more engaging  --IF references alone don't make it interesting
  • Where there are IF references they need to be more clever
  • Some of the IF references may be too much of a distraction
  • As a prototype, the code is a bit of a hack -- some things don't work as expected
  • There's a lot of hard-coded logic that need to be made more general
  • There's a combinatorial explosion of objects, some of which serve no purpose yet
  • There's a need to pace how much information, topics, objects are put in front of the player in order to have more controlled pacing and more digestible information
  • The writing, especially room descriptions, needs to better convey an atmosphere of mystery
  • The dialog needs work to be more authentic, less stilted
  • The NPCs need work to be more observant of what's happening around them
  • NPC reactions need to be based on what's been revealed and what's still a secret
  • The NPCs need to help guide the story rather than just respond to questions
  • There's too much stuff lying around in closets and desk drawers 
  • There are pacing issues that need to be adjusted
  • There are still occasional ambiguity problems
  • Commands like ANALYZE, ACCUSE, ARREST still need to be implemented
  • The logic behind motives, alibis and suspects needs to be completed
  • The paceholder end of Act II needs to be more dramatic and robust
  • I need to decide whether additional locations and characters are required or whether I can limit the scope of the story to what's currently in place

The last point is perhaps the most important.  My original story outline includes The Brass Lantern, a roadhouse not far from the Blakely Estate and a barkeep named Nelson Graham. I'm not so concerned with the additional effort of writing that section, but figuring out how to keep the pacing tight could be a challenge.  And in the meantime, I think I need to focus on tightening up Act II before jumping into Act III.

No doubt there's a lot of work ahead.  With a more-than-fulltime job, it's gonna be a challenge.  But if I can break it down into smaller steps, perhaps I can just take it 1 mile at a time.  Meanwhile, feedback, suggestions, input and SCRIPT transcripts are always welcome!  

I used the IntroComp time period as a way to take a break from the source code other than fixing very minor errors, typos, etc. So now I'm ready to dive back in.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

More Z-Machine Matter... you can do it!

good to hear you're back on track!

hey, can u email me please? i wanna bounce some ideas off ya. thanks!
-cory

thanks for the encouragement guys. I'm not sure I'm actually back on track just yet, but I will be soon.
--Z

The comments to this entry are closed.